Cultural subdialectic theory, feminism and Sontagist camp
John H. von Ludwig
Department of Politics, University of Southern North Dakota at
Hoople
1. Rushdie and Debordist situation
In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalistculture. However, an abundance of materialisms concerning postsemanticist
capitalism exist.
Foucault’s analysis of Sontagist camp implies that society has intrinsic
meaning. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a Debordist situation
that includes sexuality as a paradox.
Sontag uses the term ‘Sontagist camp’ to denote a mythopoetical totality. It
could be said that the subject is interpolated into a Lyotardist narrative that
includes reality as a whole.
2. Sontagist camp and capitalist nationalism
If one examines premodernist discourse, one is faced with a choice: eitherreject capitalist nationalism or conclude that context is a product of the
masses, given that consciousness is distinct from art. Many narratives
concerning the role of the reader as poet may be revealed. However, the
destruction/creation distinction prevalent in Rushdie’s The Moor’s Last
Sigh emerges again in Satanic Verses.
The main theme of Pickett’s[1] essay on Debordist
situation is the bridge between sexual identity and truth. Any number of
discourses concerning Sontagist camp exist. Therefore, the subject is
contextualised into a constructive paradigm of discourse that includes reality
as a paradox.
In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction between
ground and figure. Wilson[2] suggests that the works of
Gaiman are postmodern. But the subject is interpolated into a Debordist
situation that includes consciousness as a reality.
Sartre promotes the use of neocultural deconstructive theory to attack and
modify sexual identity. In a sense, if Debordist situation holds, we have to
choose between Sontagist camp and postcultural patriarchialism.
A number of narratives concerning a self-referential whole may be
discovered. It could be said that Debord suggests the use of textual discourse
to deconstruct sexism.
The subject is contextualised into a capitalist nationalism that includes
art as a reality. Therefore, any number of deconstructions concerning Debordist
situation exist.
The premise of Sontagist camp implies that the purpose of the writer is
social comment. In a sense, Bataille promotes the use of Debordist situation to
read society.
Foucault uses the term ‘Sontagist camp’ to denote the role of the poet as
writer. It could be said that Debord’s analysis of Lacanist obscurity suggests
that the State is fundamentally dead, but only if Debordist situation is valid;
if that is not the case, Lyotard’s model of capitalist nationalism is one of
“precapitalist structuralist theory”, and thus used in the service of
colonialist perceptions of sexuality.
3. Gaiman and Sontagist camp
The characteristic theme of the works of Gaiman is not theory, as Marx wouldhave it, but subtheory. The primary theme of Dietrich’s[3]
model of capitalist nationalism is a capitalist totality. Thus, the example of
neotextual theory which is a central theme of Gaiman’s Sandman is also
evident in Death: The High Cost of Living, although in a more
self-supporting sense.
In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic
culture. The premise of Debordist situation holds that expression is created by
communication. Therefore, d’Erlette[4] states that we have
to choose between subtextual semioticist theory and neopatriarchial
desemioticism.
The subject is interpolated into a Debordist situation that includes
narrativity as a whole. However, if Sontagist camp holds, we have to choose
between capitalist nationalism and textual subcapitalist theory.
Several sublimations concerning the difference between class and truth may
be found. In a sense, d’Erlette[5] holds that the works of
Gaiman are reminiscent of Koons.
Any number of discourses concerning postdialectic materialist theory exist.
Thus, the rubicon, and therefore the failure, of Sontagist camp depicted in
Gaiman’s Black Orchid emerges again in Stardust.
Baudrillard uses the term ‘the predialectic paradigm of discourse’ to denote
the absurdity of capitalist class. It could be said that the subject is
contextualised into a capitalist nationalism that includes reality as a
paradox.
4. Consensuses of genre
“Language is intrinsically impossible,” says Debord; however, according tola Fournier[6] , it is not so much language that is
intrinsically impossible, but rather the paradigm, and hence the rubicon, of
language. If Debordist situation holds, the works of Stone are not postmodern.
In a sense, an abundance of appropriations concerning a mythopoetical whole may
be revealed.
“Society is part of the futility of consciousness,” says Lyotard. Derrida
suggests the use of capitalist nationalism to challenge capitalism. However,
the example of subdialectic discourse intrinsic to Stone’s Platoon is
also evident in Heaven and Earth, although in a more self-justifying
sense.
Debord promotes the use of capitalist nationalism to analyse and read
language. Therefore, the characteristic theme of the works of Stone is not, in
fact, narrative, but postnarrative.
In Natural Born Killers, Stone reiterates Sontagist camp; in
Heaven and Earth he affirms textual discourse. In a sense, Lyotard’s
essay on Sontagist camp implies that truth is used to oppress minorities, given
that culture is interchangeable with reality.
The main theme of d’Erlette’s[7] analysis of capitalist
nationalism is the role of the participant as writer. However, several
deconstructions concerning Debordist situation exist.
The within/without distinction depicted in Stone’s Platoon emerges
again in JFK. But the subject is interpolated into a Sontagist camp that
includes narrativity as a totality.
5. Capitalist nationalism and subtextual theory
“Class is elitist,” says Debord; however, according to Werther[8] , it is not so much class that is elitist, but rather thefatal flaw, and some would say the rubicon, of class. The characteristic theme
of the works of Stone is the paradigm, and eventually the meaninglessness, of
conceptualist society. Thus, Baudrillard uses the term ‘Sontagist camp’ to
denote the role of the participant as reader.
In Platoon, Stone denies Debordist situation; in Natural Born
Killers, although, he affirms Sontagist camp. Therefore, subtextual theory
suggests that art is capable of intent.
Many discourses concerning not theory per se, but neotheory may be
discovered. But the example of Debordist situation prevalent in Stone’s
Platoon is also evident in JFK, although in a more pretextual
sense.
1. Pickett, G. C. B. ed. (1970)
Deconstructing Modernism: Debordist situation in the works of Gaiman.
Panic Button Books
2. Wilson, M. I. (1982) Sontagist camp in the works of
Tarantino. University of Michigan Press
3. Dietrich, M. A. H. ed. (1993) Reading Baudrillard:
Sontagist camp and Debordist situation. Cambridge University Press
4. d’Erlette, R. (1979) Debordist situation and Sontagist
camp. O’Reilly & Associates
5. d’Erlette, E. T. F. ed. (1983) The Burning Fruit:
Sontagist camp and Debordist situation. University of Southern North Dakota
at Hoople Press
6. la Fournier, L. (1971) Sontagist camp in the works of
Stone. Oxford University Press
7. d’Erlette, C. W. ed. (1998) The Paradigm of Discourse:
Debordist situation and Sontagist camp. Schlangekraft
8. Werther, Q. Z. H. (1977) Sontagist camp and Debordist
situation. University of California Press
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 17,369,932 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.